Human nature vs. Human condition Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Human reputation vs. Human position - Essay ExampleBut it needs to be n aned here that e precisething that relates to us is inbuilt. Some features that wee up our personality be depending on our past rather than having a scientific background. Things that build up the human condition ar marriages, deaths, terrorism, physical activities like sports etc. which are not applicable to whatever scientific authoring need to be studied in a more humanly manner. cerebration about humans and the rest of nature has focused on componentd biological properties and environmental attitudes. (Levin, 9) The reason why people confuse these very different branches of anthropology is that these branches scorn being quite different share certain features which are quite similar when it comes to human development and growth. It needs to be discriminated here the struggle between those features that symbolize the human way of living as we take it to be and the reasonable birdsong that it has taken origin from the human nature.at times it is easy to discriminate. For instance, cooking is part of ones everyday activity and despite how essential it is to us humans we can still not consider to be part of our nature although it has a past but still the utensils, material etc. required to produce food is not innate but a creation. Likewise sports is not something we were naturally interested in or has an evolutionary history but it is more of a requirement of ones prevailing conditions and desires. But the problem arises with certain ply that is quite intriguing for even researchers because of their dominating biological nature. The philosopher I would like to mention here are Thomas Hobbes and Plato who both in their distinct manner have contributed to propagate this theory. Although The interpersonal structures of humanity, the genesis of social order cannot be conveyed from a philosophical perspective (Klein and Sitling, 191) In Hobbes book Leviathan he provides a very d etailed analysis about the human condition. In this book he tells that our internal desires, motives and behavior are all because of the biological processes that are taking place inside us. The choice between good and bad, overcompensate and wrong is merely the choice of the individual and his/her personal preferences. When one is not flinched by hunting lodge and is only answerable to him then the objective of living fades. In a natural atmosphere one does not need to abide by justice or injustice but can cull what he prefers and neglect what is not a part of his conscious choice o0r ill for his existence. Apparently the vulnerability Thomas Hobbes tried to draw was fairly vague with no practicality in itself. He believed that the humans did not require moral or ethical value to survive. There was no room for justice, fairness, trust, equality etc. which are such virtues without which a auberge can never prosper. For instance if the people constituting a society have only de sires of primary necessities like food etc. then the one in cause and dominance on the basis of his position would oppress the one underneath depriving the oppressed one of his basic necessities. The reason behind such representation was not to portray a scary sort of a depiction but was consciously based on the ethics of society. For instance if today we are bound to morality, value and principles it is merely because we have a sense of responsibility and certain infused respect for others which we have learnt from our surroundings. If these values vanish and humans are not liable to others then an environment will be created that would be free from justice with bloodshed and injustice everywhere. Furthermore an environment would be created that w